I feel like it is to a certain degree, to discourage trigger-happy voting behaviour that pushes the masses one way or another… this dude is just a clown.
Comment on User "threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works" is banning users for downvoting his posts.
remon@ani.social 7 hours agoIMO, it enforces some sort of accountability to people’s voting behaviour.
But that was never something that was needed.
Instead now you get mods like this going around banning people for votes, intimidating people for voting which is removing the communities ability to hold bad posts accountable.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
remon@ani.social 7 hours ago
But these clowns are surprisingly common and much more of a problem than some trigger happy votes.
Skavau@piefed.social 1 hour ago
Then power-hungry moderators who behave like this can sully their reputation, risk the ire of the instance admin who may remove them over this, and if not - also risk the ire of the fediverse who might just recreate their community on another instance and supplant them.
subignition@fedia.io 6 hours ago
And it's a lot easier to notice and act on bad behavior when activity is public. Maybe on a centralized service that can afford full time moderation staff, you could restrict that information more effectively, but considering the fediverse is community driven, I think this is an effective choice
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
You’re probably right about that.
Skavau@piefed.social 1 hour ago
As I said in this thread to someone else.
There are accounts who genuinely do go around downvoting en masse without any contributions. When I was growing my community, I caught about 5 accounts - some with no post history, and no contribution history on my community doing it. They also had a long mod log history of bans for doing it elsewhere.
So I banned them because they kept burying new posts.
remon@ani.social 1 hour ago
Doesn’t seem sound like a major problem to me.
Skavau@piefed.social 1 hour ago
It is to growing communities. My community is large and not controversial enough to worry about that much now. But it was not always like that