Comment on

capt_kafei@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• turbowafflz@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  It’s punycode, it displays as japanese characters in a real browser.

  en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode

  1000020477

  source

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    For those curious, the characters are katakana (the syllabary often used in Japan for foreign words, onomatopoeia, etc) and the characters read “ma-ri-u-su”, which is possibly intended to represent “Marius” under Japanese spelling conventions.

    source
  • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    in a real browser

    Which is a major security risk and you should avoid those “real browsers”.

    by displaying Unicode characters an attacker can send you a link that clearly shows its yahoo.com and you see in the browser url that its yahoo.com but in reality its unicode letters that look similar to latin one.

    that’s really bad

    source

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Not everyone uses English. Many languages can’t be written with only ASCII characters.

      source

      • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        I get why it was introduced. I am telling you why its dangrous

        source
    • turbowafflz@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I’m not aware of a modern browser that doesn’t render it by default. I meant a real browser as in a browser not a lemmy client

      source

      • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        you are right.

        You could disable it though in firefox: “about:config” and find “network.IDN_show_punycode” and set to true.

        forbes.com/…/chrome-and-firefox-adding-protection…

        source
  • capt_kafei@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I didn’t know about that, thanks for sharing.

    source
  • cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Thx TIL

    source
• HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Others have explained the unicode-in-URL aspect sufficiently, but I can speak to the author of the site somewhat. His or her blog posts have hit the fediverse several times before. They're often insightful and skeptical, highly privacy conscious. I hope they don't mind if I take this part from their FAQ:

  Can I trust the information on this website?

  No. And you should never trust any single website or entity. Especially not the ones that have sponsored content or have no academic/professional background in the topics they post about.

  Take this information as mere pointers into different directions, that scratch the surface and ultimately provoke your itch to find out more about the individual topics. Do your own research and come to your own conclusions.

  source
• paequ2@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  So, you monolingual? 🙂

  source

  • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Woah are you a monophobe or something?

    source

    • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Hey Monnie! sneer voice

      source
• NegentropicBoy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  xn–gck…whatever is famous in some circles!

  source
• mesamunefire@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Its fine. Trust me /s

  Actually probably good on you to not trust everything on the internet.

  This individual has a strange url but generally has some really insightful articles.

  source

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    It’s not really a “strange url” it’s just the way we decided to implement unicode into URLs, which for the purposes of phishing links is catastrophically dangerous, so it’s never really been widely adopted and most sites choose by default to show the raw URL, for safety. This is why we can’t have nice things (and instead need to have xn-dfg344jlb5jsdfl543sdfsd.com)

    source