First, we don’t have this in Android and we’re better off.
It’s another flavour of gatekeeping.
Second, why do we want to copy apple?
SulaymanF@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Apple requires some developer credentials and notarization for sideloading apps, to prevent known malware. What is the problem with this?
First, we don’t have this in Android and we’re better off.
It’s another flavour of gatekeeping.
Second, why do we want to copy apple?
Apple method is terrible too and had to be forced by the EU to allow sideloading so tried to make it as restrictive as possible within the rules. And they didn’t bother to support. It outside the EU. So Apple is not the one to use as a defense of restrictions to installation of software om Android.
“North Korea does [X], what’s the problem with [USA/UK/EU] doing [X]?”
to prevent known malware
Nope
Do you think Google won’t revoke the signature for apps like revanced or newpipe or send a c&d to the now doxxed devs?
Main reason apple did that is to limit piracy, nsfw apps and track how many installs so they can still bill the developer for that
Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
People use Android to note have such restrictions.
Something like F-Droid (which published its own builds from source) would likely not be possible with such a model.
ripcord@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
It’s certainly one of the main reasons I moved.