Comment on Have you know???.

Engywuck@lemmy.zip ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

• MrSmith@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  That’s, like, your opinion, man.

  source

  • Engywuck@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt

    No

    source

    • MrSmith@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      🦗

      source
• absentbird@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  People say this, but almost every time the time interval is left off it’s hours.

  Either way, the numbers in this meme are clearly made up. Most image generation uses fewer than 10 watt hours.

  source

  • Engywuck@lemmy.zip ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    People say this, but almost every time the time interval is left off it’s hours.

    This is new for me. Must be some engineering thing. I’m a physicist and and I feel guilty if I leave out some units just because, lol.

    source
  • m532@lemmygrad.ml ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Can confirm. Image generation with SDXL Turbo uses approx. 0.4 wH.

    source
• flandish@lemmy.world ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  it’s about energy transfer though. transfer of titty whats to watts to my mind.

  source

  • HumanoidTyphoon@quokk.au ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    That’s just science

    source
• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Its continuous to keep the image active in your mind :)

  source

  • bryndos@fedia.io ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    That'd need watt hours though. Meme is only showing the instantaneous power required to conjure the image for an infinitesimal amount of time - you cant do any useful 'work' with it unless the time is accounted for.
    Watt seconds maybe.

    What makes me skeptikal of this data though is that the correct sciencing term for a billion watts is the well established 'jiggawatt'. In this context I'd have also accepted the Canadian spelling 'jigglewatt'.

    source

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Yeah no. Imagine it like a computer and screen. To render an image it will momentarily consume a bit more power, but as soon as it has been rendered it will still continuosily consume x Watt to keep running and displaying the picture. For continuous operation of something with no specified time, Watt is the correct unit.

      source
    • BussyGyatt@feddit.org ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      not “infinitesimal time.” continuously. think of it like this: to continuously think up perky tits, it takes a human mind 12 watts- brain is a 12 watt computer. time interval is proportional to the number of titty images/length of titty video. and im psure an individual instance of titty ai doesn’t come out to 2.7 jigglewatts- im like 80% sure i can get a titty generator to run on my lil 50 watt phone. not testing that assumption today tho.

      source
• Steve@startrek.website ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  And the text dosnt specify a time interval, whats your point?

  source

  • Engywuck@lemmy.zip ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    That watts by themselves mean nothing with regard to energy consumption.

    source
  • REDACTED@infosec.pub ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Also, it literally is an energy unit used in measurements. It’s meant as a continious power. Ie. Your active imagination consumes around 12 watts of power, not “rendering one image”

    source

    • Eheran@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That’s power, not energy.

      source

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        And what is power?

        source

        • -> View More Comments