Yeah I don’t think the company should be legally responsible, since the streamers were investigated for abuse and subsequently cleared by police. Was there something the platform was legally obligated to do further? We can say it was morally wrong to allow the streaming of that type of content, yes
Comment on Kick faces possible $49 M fine after French streamer Jean Pormanove dies on air
SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 12 hours agoWell. Devil’s advocate, they are holding the streaming service responsible because they didn’t block the stream, which presumably would presumably disrupt the streamer’s actions. I don’t personally think Kick should be responsible at all.
moodymellodrone@sopuli.xyz 6 hours ago
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 11 hours ago
Yeah, I don’t see how they’re responsible either, but I’m getting lots of emotional replies and nobody actually seems to want to admit they’re advocating censorship. Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a thing.
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Sometimes censorship is good
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 11 hours ago
Who decides when it’s good and when it isn’t?
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Something being subjective and something untrue aren’t the same thing
mrdown@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Law is law
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 7 hours ago
Yeah, like all those laws about Israel and Palestine and such. Definitely no pesky emotions involved, no sirree
mrdown@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
The law that oblige all UN stste members to stop isrsel terrorisms? Yes they should be applied