Comment on YouTube secretly used AI to edit people's videos. The results could bend reality

• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  You could probably make it illegal to alter people’s videos without their explicit consent. But also the Republicans have shown us that laws mean what the people in charge want

  source

  • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    without their explicit consent.

    By signing up to this service you agree to allow us to alter or modify your content as we require for efficient operation or to increase content engagement

    source

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      You can make that kind of thing illegal. I think “shrink wrap eulas” are dubious. Rule that fine print with a bunch of other stuff doesn’t count as explicit. Like there are rules now about cookie acceptance that has changed how the web works, and most sites don’t try to hide the cookie thing because that’s against the rules.

      source

      • hazl@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        We wouldn’t need so many damn laws to prevent shitty companies from doing shitty things if we could just become the kind of society that doesn’t support shitty companies. The cookie thing is a great example of how a well–intentioned regulation made the internet an even more irritating place to be.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I kinda doubt you’d be able to write a law that would actually have the effect you’re looking for. In the case of what you just wrote, all YouTube would need to do is write into their ToS that by uploading to their platform you’ve given them explicit permission to alter the video for purposes of storage space or increasing/decreasing quality.

    source

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I think you’re under estimating what the law can do, probably because most of the time it’s used to bolster rich assholes.

      source
• jonesey71@lemmus.org ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It might not be currently illegal but I think there should be a law defining “crimes against society” that only applies to corporations and politicians. It could be vague like “disorderly conduct” but just for corpos and politicians and would include things like lying to the public and could have punishments like corpos losing their business license (death) and banishment to the moon/sun for politicians.

  source

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Overly vague laws are never a good thing.

    source