Then they do the calculation on the costs to raise the children and decide it’s not economically viable.
Comment on Why aren't you creating more workers??
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 1 month agoCapitalist Corporations: … hmmmm … i guess there’s no choice … artificial human breeding it is!
WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 1 month ago
AA5B@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s always economically viable, just a matter of tracking all the expenses and adding it to the child’s debt. As soon as it’s old enough to work you can garnish it’s wages for all that unpaid debt
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
It would be economically viable up to a certain age. And if you maintained a certain age average, costs could be easily maintained to sustainable levels.
When you start analyzing the world and people as a series of costs and expenses, it’s very easy to find solutions.
As humans, we’ve already done that many times before … most recently in the 1940s on an industrial scale … we are capable of doing it again.
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 month ago
If we’re going that route billionaires are less economically viable than children…
x4740N@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I feel like this is a plot of a dystopian movie somewhere where they breed artificial humans to make into slaves
Chev@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The robots are coming for our women. 🤖😳
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Capitalism would also charge for every part of the process, raising the price as some techno feudal lord thinks they can find the right balance between extinction pricing and maximum shareholder value.
plyth@feddit.org 1 month ago
FTFY