Comment on If copyright on a work expired immediately after death, would be that a bad or good idea?

• gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Because the benefits of labour don’t pass on to your children, period?

  Maybe there’s something out there I’m unaware of, but I don’t understand the implication in your question.

  source

  • spankmonkey@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Inheritance

    source

    • gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That’s not «the benefits of labour» being passed on to your children, is it? That’s what you own being passed on to your children… And it’s taxed! Maybe it would be a good idea to have taxes on inherited IP, though. Then again, if the taxes are at or above 50% then wouldn’t that mean that the state would inherit control over the IP, hence making it public domain? Meh.

      source

      • spankmonkey@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        You own copyright the same way you own a piece of paper that says you own a house. Someone who made a lot of money in a short time from their labor can pass on the rest to their children. Copyright spreads out the income over time by allowing exclusive income on ideas for a limited period of time. It is what allows a musician to make money from their songs without needing someone to directly pay them for writing fhe song at the time it was made.

        Copyright as a concept is not horrible when applied to exclusive distribution for a short period of time, and that time period shouldn’t arbitrary end on death any more than someone should lose the house their family lives in because the person whose name is ok the deed died in an accident.

        It just needs to be far shorter and companies should be changed so that the way people and companies use it. Otherwise every person would create a company, give it the Copyright, and then fhe company could be i herited.

        source