No, but the climate was probably cooler and drier than today. In fact the interior regions of the supercontinent might have been too dry to support most life-forms.
Comment on xkcd #3132: Coastline Similarity
frog@feddit.uk 3 days ago
When there was only one land mass, is there any scientific theories if that would change the rotation of the earth on its axis or around the sun?
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
mineralfellow@lemmy.world 2 days ago
It would not. The mass of the Earth doesn’t change, and angular momentum is conserved.
frog@feddit.uk 1 day ago
I was curious since mass would seem lopsided. I guess not enough. Thanks for answering.
WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 day ago
The crust of the earth is relatively thinner than the skin of an apple from my understanding. So I wouldn’t expect anything happening on the crust to have a huge impact on that kind of behavior. Granted, even small changes could be noticable.
frog@feddit.uk 1 day ago
That’s a great point. When it comes to the Earth’s mass, the surface is barely a factor.
deltapi@lemmy.world 1 day ago
My layman’s understanding is that the water mostly makes up for it, and that more wobble comes from the moon than any inconsistency in land-mass distribution