If my buddies and spend a month plotting a crimer in my cousin’s spare room, the cousin would be complicit since he knowingly allowed us to use his property for a criminal conspiracy. The USPS doesn’t know what i am sending in the mail since they are a common carrier.
So if an attack is planned via mail you think we should sue the postal service? The phone company if it’s done over the phone?
Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 1 year ago
UnhappyCamper@kbin.social 1 year ago
Great analogy
DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Actually, they’d just try to seize his house, since proving his complicity is more challenging than proving that the house was used for the planning of a crime.
hypelightfly@kbin.social 1 year ago
Change mail (private) to moderated public notice board (not private). The owner of the public notice board should probably be sued for allowing the content to stay up.
Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
Is the postal service intentionally increasing mail to people interested in attacks by people messaging that attacks are necessary? If the postal service is doing that to increase the total postal volume, then yes, we should.
narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 year ago
No, because these things should be private. Social media however needs some kind of moderation.
curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 year ago
I think just the poster should suffice, we should leave the platforms out of it. If anything, it helps to out the assholes who would post stuff that enables this.
narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 year ago
Blocking a user and removing content from a platform should be relatively easy and fast which should prevent organized crimes. Sueing someone afterwords takes way more resources and time.
But a platform can remove content without getting sued. Why sue them too? Because if you don’t sue their asses they don’t care.
Of course moderation takes time and can’t be perfect and this should be considered when suing the platform owners. And yes this could help the assholes, but I think you can report such behavior to the fbi or someone.