Because businesses that use .NET are already paying for it with their visual studio subscription or higher Microsoft support. It’s a bare minimum product that has no incentive to improve because no one pays for it. But businesses force the use of because “we’re already paying for it”
Comment on GitHub is no longer independent at Microsoft after CEO resignation
marlowe221@lemmy.world 4 days ago
The real question is…. WHY DOES AZURE DEVOPS STILL EXIST?!?!?
Master167@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Tempo@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Ah, the age old Microsoft strategy of bundling.
darksiderbun@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
Better than Jira IMO, but it’s just the one I use, so 🤷
dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 4 days ago
Our company runs everything on Azure. We use windows PCs, Visual Studio Professional, C# .Net, outlook, teams, etc.
We make enterprise software and I am happy really. I wasn’t at the start but as time goes on I don’t care, I do my job and go home.
bvoigtlaender@feddit.org 4 days ago
Username checks out :)
essteeyou@lemmy.world 3 days ago
The company I worked at got acquired by a big tech company. We’re switching from Google suite to Microsoft, Mac to Windows, Slack to Teams, etc. It’s pretty painful as transitions go, and if not for golden handcuffs I’d be gone.
I’m not sure if I’ll ever be happy with Visual Studio though, so I use Jetbrains Rider.
Nikls94@lemmy.world 3 days ago
So your company either works with Microsoft or has a weird idea of security. Teams does not work without taking home to Microsoft. My company tried everything but couldn’t make it work, so they extended their Skype for business service for some years.
I hope they switch to Linux when this is over.
dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 3 days ago
Been in business 20 years with regular pen testing and had no complaints and have some pretty large clients.
.Net is popular in the UK for enterprise.
Might do you well to make less assumptions.