I remember Sourceforge, bitbucket, and a host of other "source" servers. GitHub was nice for a while, but its just another iteration of the same. Heck a lot of the major repos (like Linux for example) only do mirrors to GitHub. The same with codeberg, Gitlab, and other centralized services.
At my last few jobs, we couldn't host on GitHub because of HIPPAA compliance. It was fine. Self hosting git is VERY common in quite a few industries.
grue@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
So what you’re saying is that we need federated git.
kybean@pawb.social 17 hours ago
Forgejo, the software project powering Codeberg, is working on adding federation but it’s got a long way to go before it’s a usable feature
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 18 hours ago
Huh. Gitlab just said it’s too hard with their cut staffing numbers and they’re not doing federation.
alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 hours ago
Yeah, IRRC thus far they only have starring (not I starring, mind you) implemented and it’s not even in main yet
lime@feddit.nu 17 hours ago
…git is federated. i’m assuming they’re talking about things like issues and runners, but i don’t think that’s really necessary…
alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 hours ago
As in the federation of Forges, like Forgejo is trying to do
mesamunefire@piefed.social 17 hours ago
The closest I found that works is: https://hackaday.com/2024/03/16/radicle-an-open-source-peer-to-peer-github-alternative/
https://radicle.xyz/
It took a LONG time to get set up on one of my systems. It worked! Unfortunately, I found that just having git by itself was fine for my purposes. And most people are throwing in behind codeberg which is fine by me.
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 hours ago
I mean, this is more-or-less how the Linux kernel is managed.