I remember Sourceforge, bitbucket, and a host of other "source" servers. GitHub was nice for a while, but its just another iteration of the same. Heck a lot of the major repos (like Linux for example) only do mirrors to GitHub. The same with codeberg, Gitlab, and other centralized services.
At my last few jobs, we couldn't host on GitHub because of HIPPAA compliance. It was fine. Self hosting git is VERY common in quite a few industries.
grue@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
So what you’re saying is that we need federated git.
kybean@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
Forgejo, the software project powering Codeberg, is working on adding federation but it’s got a long way to go before it’s a usable feature
mesamunefire@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
The closest I found that works is: https://hackaday.com/2024/03/16/radicle-an-open-source-peer-to-peer-github-alternative/
https://radicle.xyz/
It took a LONG time to get set up on one of my systems. It worked! Unfortunately, I found that just having git by itself was fine for my purposes. And most people are throwing in behind codeberg which is fine by me.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Huh. Gitlab just said it’s too hard with their cut staffing numbers and they’re not doing federation.
lime@feddit.nu 3 weeks ago
…git is federated. i’m assuming they’re talking about things like issues and runners, but i don’t think that’s really necessary…
alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
As in the federation of Forges, like Forgejo is trying to do
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
If you read it again, you may find I said gitlab and not just git.
And we won’t talk about how git’s decentralization is nothing like the concept of federation as it’s being used in this entire discussion.
alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Yeah, IRRC thus far they only have starring (not I starring, mind you) implemented and it’s not even in main yet
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
I mean, this is more-or-less how the Linux kernel is managed.