So cancer cell detection is now bad and those doing it should feel bad?
The world isn’t black’n white.
Comment on Lemmy be like
kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
AI is bad and people who use it should feel bad.
Valmond@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Don’t be obtuse, you walnut. I’m obviously not equating medical technology with 12-fingered anime girls and plagiarism.
Valmond@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
You still mix all AI stuff in, what about hating LLMs and image generators?
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Me to burn victims: “You know, without fire, we couldn’t grill meat. Right? You should think more about what you say.”
Valmond@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
???
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 18 hours ago
it’s not in the least confusing lmao, you know damn well what they mean and are just acting confused as a “gotcha”
Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
So is eating meat, flying, gaming, going om holiday, basically if you exist you should feel bar
kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
How does one feel bar?
Sl00k@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
Would love an explanation on how I’m in the wrong on reducing my work week from 40 hours to 15 using AI.
Existing in predatory capitalistic system and putting the blame on those who utilize available tools to reduce the predatory nature of our system is insane.
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Because when your employer catches on, they’ll bring you back up to 40 anyway.
And probably because those 15 hours now produce shit quality.
Sl00k@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
My employer is pushing AI usage, if the work is done the work is done. This is the reality we’re supposed to be living in with AI, just conforming to the current predatory system because “AI bad” actively harms more than it helps.
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
The current predatory system will raise the limit on the 40 work week if they’re allowed to. 60. 80. You might not even get a weekend. Unions fought for your weekend.
AI does not fundamentally change this relationship. It is the same predatory system.
SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
You mean a subset of LLM that are trained on bad human behaviours
absentbird@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
When people say this they are usually talking about a very specific sort of generative LLM using unsupervised learning.
AI is a very broad field with great potential, the improvements in cancer screening alone could save millions of lives over the coming decades. At the core it’s just math, and the equations have been in use for almost as long as we’ve had computers. It’s no more good or bad than calculus or trigonometry.
occultist8128@infosec.pub 2 weeks ago
No hope commenting like this, just get ready getting downvoted with no reason. People use wrong terms and normalize it.
kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
It’s funny watching you AI bros climb over each other to be the first with a what about-ism.
occultist8128@infosec.pub 2 weeks ago
See I get the point of people hating what they call ‘AI’ here, I totally get it but I can’t see people using wrong terms since I know the correct one. The big corpos already misuse the term saying everything they made AI without specifying what kind of AI it is and people here that I assume techie also went to the wrong path (so you guys are the same as those evils, and u fell on the marketing). It’s not about whataboutism — it’s fixing what people always normalize using wrong terms when talking about technical stuff. I don’t care if you still don’t get it tho, I do what I can for saying the truth.
KombatWombat@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Providing a counterexample to a claim is not whataboutism.
Whataboutism involves derailing a conversation with an ad-hominem to avoid addressing someone’s argument, like what you just did.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
The comment currently has 20 points. Get off your cross…