They probably can, but it’s still immoral and unethical.
Comment on Meta deletes Al Jazeera presenter’s profile after show criticising Israel
yoz@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Meta is a private company and can do whatever it wants. Nothing to see here. Yea…go ahead down vote me
Schmuppes@lemmy.world 1 year ago
yoz@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Yea right! Thats how for profit companies work.
Petter1@lemm.ee 1 year ago
And that’s why we regulate our capitalism… Free market does not work, well it does, but only for the rich 🤑
abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I mean, yeah, and people can express dislike for their policy
BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf 1 year ago
This is true, and the reason people need to stop using social media as their source for news.
When a company has sophisticated algorithms ment to only show you things that will get you engaged - you are not getting unbiased news. Add Meta’s personal agendas on top of that and you get the shitshow that is facebook as a news source.
yoz@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Thank you and hope the idiots down voting me can use common sense.
Adubya@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m going to write something bad about you that can legally be disputed, refuted, or might not be verifiable right away. Please host me & that content at your expense. Thank you bye!
-Sincerely Biggest Brained Boy
Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 year ago
It can, but that doesnt mean ít’s excused from criticism if it does something incredibly stupid and amoral.
tryptaminev@feddit.de 1 year ago
Helping war criminals cover up their crimes is illegal under most countries jurisdictions.
FMT99@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Maybe people are finally starting to realize (although way too late) that handing over our “public” fora to private companies was a bad idea.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 year ago
I forgot no action can be criticized unless it’s literally illegal. Silly me.