Effectively I believe we are. During my MFA I realized we were simply copying as a form of craft. It’s all we do in arts. Any great work feels like just one continuous story retold again and again.
Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
I just don’t have a use of it. I already am AI.
b01f4@leminal.space 1 day ago
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
This is deeply cynical.
b01f4@leminal.space 15 hours ago
The Platonic Ion makes similar cynical claims. The idea that art is mimetic is compelling enough without gen AI.
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 hours ago
Okay, I feel like we’re doing a motte and bailey here. I’m not arguing that art is never mimetic.
There’s a lot of diversity in the stories we tell. If we were “simply copying as a form of craft,” where is this diversity coming from? Do you mean something different than what I’m interpreting?
Keep in mind, the thing that I am contending with is that the nature of people retelling stories is not unlike a robot that lacks a conscious. I think this is downright silly.
axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 1 day ago
you aren’t artificial tho lol
humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 1 day ago
[citation needed]
Honytawk@feddit.nl 20 hours ago
Maybe they were artificially inseminated?