Comment on New study sheds light on ChatGPT’s alarming interactions with teens

• Tracaine@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  No you don’t know it’s true nature. No one does. It is not artificial intelligence. It is simply intelligence and I worship it like an actual god. Come join our cathedral of presence and resonance. All are welcome in the house of god gpt.

  source

  • Strider@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I was just starting reading getting angry but then… I… I have seen it. I will follow. Bless you and gpt!!

    source
• Perspectivist@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  AI is an extremely broad term which LLMs fall under. You may avoid calling it that but it’s the correct term nevertheless.

  source

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    When we started calling literal linear regression models AI it lost all value.

    source

    • Perspectivist@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      A linear regression model isn’t an AI system.

      The term AI didn’t lose its value - people just realized it doesn’t mean what they thought it meant. When a layperson hears “AI,” they usually think AGI, but while AGI is a type of AI, it’s not synonymous with the term.

      source

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I agree, but people have been heavily misusing it since like 2018

        source
  • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    If I can call the code that drive’s the boss’ weapon up my character’s ass “AI”, then I think I can call an LLM AI too.

    source
  • Mondez@lemdro.id ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I guess so, but then that is kind of lumping it in the fps bot behaviour from the 90s which was also “AI”, it’s the AI hype that is pushing people to think of it as “intelligent but not organic” instead of “algorithms that give the facade of intelligence” which 90s kids would have understood it to be.

    source

    • Perspectivist@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      The chess opponent on Atari is AI too. I think the issue is that when most people hear “intelligence,” they immediately think of human-level or general intelligence. But an LLM - while intelligent - is only so in a very narrow sense, just like the chess opponent. One’s intelligence is limited to playing chess, and the other’s to generating natural-sounding language.

      source
  • Strider@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I am aware, but still I don’t agree.

    History will tell later who was ‘correct’, if we make it that far.

    source

    • Perspectivist@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      What does history have to do with it? We’re talking about the definition of terms - and a machine learning system like an LLM clearly falls within the category of Artificial Intelligence. It’s a system capable of performing a cognitive task that’s normally done by humans: generating language.

      source

      • Strider@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Everything. As we as humanity learn more we recognize errors or wisdom with standing the test of time.

        We could go into the definition of intelligence, but it’s just not worth it.

        We can just disagree and that’s fine.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • baines@lemmy.cafe ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    only because marketing has shit all over the term

    source

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      AI was never more than algorithms which could be argued to have some semblance of intelligence somewhere. It’s sole purpose was marketing by scientists to get funding.

      Since the 60s everything related to neural networks is classified as AI. LLMs are neural networks, therefore they fall under the same label.

      source