It’s still only “up to 20%” 🙄
Comment on This boomer couple would be hit with $700,000 tax bill if they sold their mansion
Delphia@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoThe unfair part of this is that the $500k threshold for the tax hasnt been updated since 1997.
In 1997 the average price for a house in California was about 180k now its $800k. If the tax was the same ratio it now wouldnt apply until the house was worth about 2.2mil (napkin math, I’m not getting out the calculator) Now I’m not saying they arent crying about a problem many of us would kill to have but thats a difference of about $340,000 in taxes.
bluefootedbooby@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Soup@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
And how much have wages gone up? $500k is still very expensive, sounds like maybe it should be a little more but it sounds more like a consequence of letting housing prices run away for a few decades.
Delphia@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Either you shouldnt be paying any capital gains on a primary residence full stop or it should be on a sliding rate over time. (20% for first year -1% per year after)
Buying a house (even a mcmansion) and living in it for 30 years isnt a hustle or an investment strategy… its just living.
deathbird@mander.xyz 2 weeks ago
That’s… actually an interesting way to slow down flippers.
Soup@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Plenty of folks are relying on the sale of their homes to pay for retirement, this couple in question is even an example of that. The big issue there is that it requires home prices to just climb and climb because they have to outpace each other(a sale of a home for this purpose will also need to buy the next home). The value of the home goes up with inflation but it also gets an additional increase because now it’s expected to help pay for 15-30 years of retirement, and the cheaper houses see the price range vacuum and seek to fill it not only because of greed but also because its sale will probably be used to buy the bigger, now even more expensive home. It’s shelter and we treat it like a luxury good.
Every time the price is referenced it’s used as excuse to raise prices elsewhere. It’s a feedback loop of greed fueled by the lack of a safety net and a lack of protections for both homeowners and renters. In Canada and the US things are extra bad because the demand in good cities is high but a lot of the existing housing, and even the new stuff, is production homes in “neighbourhoods” that are isolated, car-centric deserts and it’s still expensive.
13igTyme@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Keep in mind, it’s profit. If you bought the house for $500k and selling for $800k, that’s only $300k in profit. Plus you can include the cost on renovations and there are lower percentages when you own and live in the house for over 2 years.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
They knew the limit when they bought the house. And it’s gone up more than they could’ve dreamed. That’s plenty fair.
jj4211@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Problem is their house went up by a huge percentage, but so to has every housing arrangement they will need.
Maybe not a whole lot of sympathy for someone having to sort out living arrangements with ‘only’ $2.8 million or so to work with, but this can scale down to pretty ‘normal’ house prices like $500k.