Comment on Wikipedia editors adopt a policy giving admins the authority to quickly delete AI-generated articles that meet certain criteria, like incorrect citations

• Vupware@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This has since been corrected, but there is a great video by BadEmpanada about the state of the Holodomor’s page:

  The Holodomor: How Wikipedia Lies to You

  source
• BrainInABox@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Wikipedia has a giant article regurgitating the false claims from the extremist Falun Gong cult that China is stealing their organs.

  source

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Link or gtfo

    source

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Here you go, Would you like me to cut your food for you too?

      source

      • eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        “Here’s a thing I believe in”

        “I would like proof it is a thing”

        “What are you, stupid? Don’t ask me for proof.”

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I read most this article and don’t see how any of it is false or misinformation. Literally the first word in the page is “alleged”, and it’s full of arguments with linked citations from both sides

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • glimse@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Why have two people replied to my request for a link with something other than a link

    source

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Here you go, Would you like me to cut your food for you too?

      source

      • glimse@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Thanks!

        This looks to be a page about the accusations and the counterarguments to said accusations, not a page claiming to the truth

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Bloomcole@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  80% of political stuff or with political importance.

  source

  • glimse@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I clicked all the words in your comment but none of them opened a browser window

    source

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      not interested in doing work for others.
      There have been plenty instances of manipulation over the years and shady practices in the organisation itself.
      Unbelievable there are still so many gullible people still thinking it’s a reputable source.
      if you love it so much for some reason then keep using it.
      garbage in, garbage out

      source

      • glimse@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Oh so you’re a “do your own research” kind of commenter

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        “Wikipedia is incorrect!”

        "No I won’t do work for you to prove my point!"

        • this guy^

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        When you make claims, you give proof. That’s how things work in reality.

        source

        • -> View More Comments