Is that what they did or did they just create a narrowly defined law for a specific purpose?
Comment on X is suing California over social media content moderation law
MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 9 months agoThe government can’t just declare itself just and act with unlimited reach
CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 9 months ago
MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
It doesn’t matter how narrow a law is if the government has no fucking place making that law
dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 9 months ago
What is precisely unlimited about this? Should companies be able to keep whatever they want behind the curtain and we aren’t allowed to ask what it is?
MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
You said that government business is whatever the government passes laws about, which literally gives the government unlimited justification to do anything and everything because, by definition, it’s the proper business of government under that standard.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 months ago
It’s the job of the government to inspect and regulate businesses and this is a reasonable and frankly way overdue example of them doing exactly that. Nothing unreasonable about it and calling it unlimited intrusion or whatever makes you look like the dumbest of libertarians, which is REALLY saying something.
Image