Comment on Tesla withheld data, lied, and misdirected police and plaintiffs to avoid blame in Autopilot crash
michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 week agoThis explanation is completely fabricated, based on nothing, and nonsense.
It is obviously critical data that nobody halfway competent would write to ram. Also video data is very large and makes no sense to store in ram.
Furthermore the article says it was deleted and they later recovered it which would not have been possible with RAM
Basically why are you pushing this drivel.
Shanedino@lemmy.world 1 week ago
If the data is temporarily stored until it is transmitted and then is not considered to be needed anymore I see no reason as to why that would need to be stored locally forever.
michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Because it may not be possible to transmit depending on location.
Shanedino@lemmy.world 1 week ago
On embedded controllers you are usually heavily limited with nonvolatile memory.
ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 6 days ago
Not sure why you think this, it’s generally trivial to add non-volatile storage to microcontrollers, and much more complicated to add external RAM.
michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Perhaps most importantly although we know it was not so lost because we read the article or at least the summary if it had been it would have been a deliberate design decision to have it be so.
Your explanation doesn’t wash in reality but it also doesn’t wash even in theory.
Shanedino@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You’re also making assumptions in that the volatile memory lost power and thus must have been cleared at some point. I dont think there is a right or a wrong based on the knowledge i have I just am throwing out a random guess.
michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 week ago
The article says Tesla deletes it and was forced to produce it. Seems pretty obvious that your theory is wrong