This explanation is completely fabricated, based on nothing, and nonsense.
It is obviously critical data that nobody halfway competent would write to ram. Also video data is very large and makes no sense to store in ram.
Furthermore the article says it was deleted and they later recovered it which would not have been possible with RAM
Basically why are you pushing this drivel.
patatahooligan@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Forensic analysis managed to retrieve this data, so it must have been stored in non-volatile memory.
kjetil@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Didnt the article say the retrieved the filename and hash, thus proving the existence of the crash diagnostic snapshot. After which Tesla handed over their copy?
Or did the forensics retrieve the actual data?
patatahooligan@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The article kind of fumbles the wording and creates confusion. There are, however, some passages that indicate to me that the actual data was recovered. All of the following are taking about the NAND flash memory.
It seems that maybe the .tar file itself was not recovered, but all the data about the crash was still there.