Hey, lemme ask you something. If somebody uploads something, and you upload, like, the exact same file somewhere else, without linking to the original designated artists url, what do you call that?
Comment on Fuck RePosts, for defenders of OC
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 months ago
What you’re complaining about is the same image being reposted multiple times…
That’s not necessarily reposting, and probably make up a minority or reposts
AllegraGory@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
Decentralization
AllegraGory@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Wrong!
It’s theft. You are stealing from artists.
who@feddit.org 10 months ago
It’s theft. You are stealing from artists.
No, it is not theft. Not in the dictionary sense. Not in the legal sense. Not in any sense at all.
It might be copyright infringement, inappropriate, and/or rude, depending on the particulars and the jurisdiction. But your claim that it is theft demonstrates that you either have no idea what you’re talking about, or you are deliberately misleading people.
Please stop.
nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 months ago
and you upload, like, the exact same file somewhere else,
Rehosting, which is what I just said…
What you’re complaining about is the same image being rehosted multiple times…
I don’t know if repeating it will get us to a different result tho
Lumidaub@feddit.org 10 months ago
Coincidence?
AllegraGory@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Don’t get chesty with me just because you’ve got a problem with your station in life!
Lumidaub@feddit.org 10 months ago
Yes, sir/ma’am. Sorry, sir/ma’am. Won’t happen again, sir/ma’am.
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m not positive, but I think OP is possibly extremely poorly communicating their position.
I think @AllegraGory@sh.itjust.works means:
“If a creator of original content posts their content online, subsequent posters shouldn’t capture/crop/alter that work then upload it elsewhere robbing the original content creator of attribution or the monetary gains they might received from hosting it on their original site. Instead, what subsequent posters should do is link to the original content at the original URL leaving the creator in full control of the hosting and perhaps any revenue they would receive from their work”
I’m not taking a position either way on this with my post merely translating what I think OP is actually trying to say. OP, please correct me if I’m wrong.