That’s not typical. Starlink is more stable than most. I monitor over 8 locations using multiple different services for internet access and Starlink is about as reliable as mpls.
Comment on Tens of thousands knocked offline after software failure at Musk’s Starlink
Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
I have to support a remote client that uses Starlink. It’s a nightmare. We can deal with slow connections, we can deal with bad ping, but with Starlink what we get is the entire connection dropping every minute or so, and coming back up a short while later. It’s unbelievably bad.
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 days ago
empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
I can almost guarantee that’s because their terminal is in a shit location with too much of the sky obscured by trees or buildings. I had to set my parents up with it two years ago and if it can’t see as much of the constellation as possible it’s going to have periods of obstructed sattelite connectivity.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
Ohh… It’s ok guys, it’s only because the sky has clouds in it.
empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
Yeahhhh about that.
LEO satellites have a lot stronger signal and their phased array terminals have a surprisingly good SNR. This isn’t your grandpa’s Hughesnet.
I never have more than a second or two of interruptions out there even though heavy rainstorms. Thunderstorms directly overhead sometimes knock it out for a few minutes if they’re dropping hail and lightning but I usually unplug my computer during those anyway. Its all about maximizing its view of the sky so it can always pick the strongest satellite at that time… M
I hate musk too but the engineering quality in starlink is insane.