Comment on The industry filed false claims against the "Stop Killing Games" initiative | Accursed Farms
mang0@lemmy.zip 2 weeks agoWatching/listening to a recording is faster than reading something.
That’s just wrong.
I can multitask while listening to it, for instance.
Why post it to youtube in that case? If you’re watching a video where the only the audio is relevant, why the fuck is it a video?
Reach and convenience. Why do you think podcasts exist on YouTube when they could’ve as well been audio-only?
Besides, some people like to see the speaker, because it gives visual clues about what’s being said. Not everybody absorbs info efficiently through reading texts or just listening. Sometimes you need more than one way of recieving information.
Why post it to youtube in that case?
“Why isn’t this text?”
YouTube has more accessibility and reach.
“Then why isn’t it an audio file?!?!?!”
Fucking what? You seem to just be upset that this exists in a way people will access.
marighost@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
what's your problem? lmao
mang0@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Going for personal attacks when you cannot think of a response? Peak intellect.
kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
You called someone an ignorant prick in this thread. Appeals to decorum are off the table for you, fuckhead.
9bananas@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
that wasn’t a personal attack.
a personal attack would be:
“man, are you just a dick or what?”
what they asked is simply a request for you to explain your motivations, since they seem nonsensical to the previous poster.
(and immediately jumping to “personal attack” when someone is trying to understand you doesn’t exactly imply “peak intellect” either. and btw, your snarky “peak intellect” <-- THAT’S a personal attack. phrasing it as a statement doesn’t make it less of an insult.)
mang0@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
No. Vaguely implying that someone has a problem is very much a personal attack. I understand that you’re upset by my opinions but how about you cry me a river?