Comment on The industry filed false claims against the "Stop Killing Games" initiative | Accursed Farms
marighost@piefed.social 1 day agoWatching/listening to a recording is faster than reading something. I can multitask while listening to it, for instance.
mang0@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
That’s just wrong.
Why post it to youtube in that case? If you’re watching a video where the only the audio is relevant, why the fuck is it a video?
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
“Why isn’t this text?”
YouTube has more accessibility and reach.
“Then why isn’t it an audio file?!?!?!”
Fucking what? You seem to just be upset that this exists in a way people will access.
marighost@piefed.social 1 day ago
what's your problem? lmao
mang0@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Going for personal attacks when you cannot think of a response? Peak intellect.
kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
You called someone an ignorant prick in this thread. Appeals to decorum are off the table for you, fuckhead.
9bananas@feddit.org 1 day ago
that wasn’t a personal attack.
a personal attack would be:
“man, are you just a dick or what?”
what they asked is simply a request for you to explain your motivations, since they seem nonsensical to the previous poster.
(and immediately jumping to “personal attack” when someone is trying to understand you doesn’t exactly imply “peak intellect” either. and btw, your snarky “peak intellect” <-- THAT’S a personal attack. phrasing it as a statement doesn’t make it less of an insult.)
Mistic@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Reach and convenience. Why do you think podcasts exist on YouTube when they could’ve as well been audio-only?
Besides, some people like to see the speaker, because it gives visual clues about what’s being said. Not everybody absorbs info efficiently through reading texts or just listening. Sometimes you need more than one way of recieving information.