Comment on the living dead

• Tithen@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Image 🤷‍♂️

  source
• Randomocity@sh.itjust.works ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I googled “human thinks he’s dead” and that Wikipedia page was the first result

  source

  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    well “skill issue” was one of the options so it might be that

    source
  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Why “human”? Seems a weird way to phrase it but I can’t deny it works.

    source

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Well I don’t think you’d find it if you tried platypus

      source
    • Randomocity@sh.itjust.works ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Normally these types of articles use more clinical verbiage

      source
• knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Pretty much the whole Internet got worse in the last decade. Search engines are a pain to use nowadays.

  source
• Dasus@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Honestly while I don’t like the AI searches, this instance maybe skill issue. Brain fart or smth

  source
• match@pawb.social ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  duckduckgo has become pretty worthless for search, ecosia is slightly better i think but without the privacy benefits. i have a local llm running in koboldcpp that i use if i really need to just bounce words off something while it nods along

  source
• mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  seems like it might be skill issue in this case. a Google search for “medical condition person thinks they’re dead” gave it immediately

  source
• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Traditional search engines are fucking garbage lately. You search for two words and it gives you generic results for whichever’s more popular. Or it decides a brief phrase, however generic, must mean exactly one thing, so you only see results related to a song by that title.

  source