If you make any edits that contradict the physical evidence, you’ve outed yourself.
We’re talking about people that contradict both themselves and physical reality on a daily basis without their supporters batting an eye.
Comment on Why doesn't the Trump administration simply edit the Epstein files and release them?
ceenote@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I’m no expert, but I would think that altering evidence is a huge risk.
If you get caught, you’ve just made the problem 100x worse, as a lot of people are just going to assume your guilt as soon as they hear you’ve tampered with the evidence.
If you make any edits that contradict the physical evidence, you’ve outed yourself.
We’re talking about people that contradict both themselves and physical reality on a daily basis without their supporters batting an eye.
Largely why I asked this. Still haven’t found a good answer that doesn’t outline how they might be caught. How cares?!
It makes no difference how good they are at photoshop, there is software that will highlight changed portions of photos in red. Skill won’t prevent that.
There is no such reliably working software. I’d love to be proven wrong, but I’ve looked into it enough that I’m quite confident it does not exist
Export to jpeg. Compress.
Can decent edits still be reliably detected?
No no. Abrego Garcia clearly had “MS-13” tattooed on his knuckles. That was no photoshop.
about #1, not only this makes number of potential leakers higher (intentional or not - by opsec failures) but also this narrows down number of loyal, reliable people who also won’t fuck up the job real fast
meco03211@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Pro-tip. Blame it on the dems. His base would eat that shit up. Doesn’t matter that it makes no sense.