Comment on Ethical frameworks are detrimental to Scientific Study because Science is by nature unethical.

• Arkouda@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Yes, because context matters. Exceptions don’t make the rule, and speaking generally about things is allowed when they are related.

  If you want to get into the semantics feel free. My statement is broad because it is a “shower thought”.

  This isn’t debate club.

  source

  • Acamon@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    This isn’t debate club.

    If people aren’t suppose to discuss and possibly disagree, why post? What do you think is the purpose of the showerthoughts community?

    source

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      If people aren’t suppose to discuss and possibly disagree, why post?

      I am open to discussion and disagreement. Look around the thread and tell me how many opening comments you see promoting discussion or civil disagreement.

      What do you think is the purpose of the showerthoughts community?

      To share “Shower thoughts”.

      Crazy concept I know.

      source

      • Acamon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        I see a bunch of people posting civil and reasonable issues with the thinking behind your shower thought, and then you replying in an immature and disingenuous manner. I think the contrasting upvotes / downvotes in your comments vs everyone elses suggests that my interpretation is shared by the wider community.

        I almost didn’t comment because I thought from your behaviour it was obvious trolling, and there’s no point reasoning with trolls. But looking through your post history, you seem like you’re generally posting on good faith, so I thought I’d try and explain that you do not need to react so defensively to legitamate discussion and disagreement.

        A shower thought doesn’t need to be factually correct to be interesting, but when you post a pretty extreme take on a serious and sensitive subject, it isn’t surprising that people are going to clarify where you’ve gone wrong.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Nefara@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Yes, because context matters. Exceptions don’t make the rule, and speaking generally about things is allowed when they are related.

    So what is the exception here? You said, and I quote, “science is by nature unethical”. So you’re saying any experimental methodology in any school of science exploring any number of completely benign things is somehow unethical.

    This isn’t debate club.

    I see you’re new to the internet.

    source

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Yes. Poking and prodding everything with no mind for repercussion is unethical, and that is where “Science” is rooted.

      Now jog on.

      source