Comment on Ethical frameworks are detrimental to Scientific Study because Science is by nature unethical.
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Wut
Comment on Ethical frameworks are detrimental to Scientific Study because Science is by nature unethical.
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Wut
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
Is the sentence hard to understand?
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 weeks ago
its just hard to understand how something so stupid can be said
The Wiki page defines ETHICS as
What you are doing is anthropomorphizing science. When science is a system of understanding nature.
And without ethics in science, we get nightmare bastardization of science.
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
It’s especially funny when you read OP’s profile bio:
JASN_DE@feddit.org 4 weeks ago
That doesn’t mean his post is false though.
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 weeks ago
It absolutely proves his post false.
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
Without ethics in Science we have a detailed understanding of our anatomy, the ability to transplant organs, numerous life saving medications, space travel, understanding of the human mind, etc.
Fact of the matter is when “ethics” are imposed on Scientific study, Scientific study is hindered, so Scientific study cannot be ethical if it is to be successful.
starlinguk@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Bring back vivisection! (you volunteering?)
You don’t seem to know what ethical means.
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 weeks ago
I think you need to understand the history of science before you debate this argument, you are basically mixing metaphors
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
You just lumped all of “science” together. Even the science of documenting birdsong?
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
Can you tell me what goes in to the Science of birdsong? I am unfamiliar with the field and expect you to be able to give me a detailed response on what goes in to it as it is your example.
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
No thanks, this is too shallow of a shower thought.
maxwells_daemon@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
It’s not hard to understand, despite being badly formulated, it’s just very questionable.
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
What about my statement is badly formulated? If it is questionable, where are your questions?
maxwells_daemon@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
You could’ve said “science is unethical by nature”, or “science is, by nature, unethical”, with commas. Those would be well formulated sentences, which would be easier to read and make sense of.
About the questions: do you oppose all ethical guidelines in science? Are there any you’re fond of? Or should science be completely unimpeded, regardless of who it damages, or what purpose it serves? Can you give any examples?
As I said, very questionable.