We already solved world hunger but due to complex reasons free market, there are still starving people.
Comment on Food.
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Personally, I wouldn’t want to try to save world hunger.
TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Tetsuo@jlai.lu 2 months ago
How are those surprlus “solving world hunger”?
There is nothing really saying that in the wikipedia page. Just because a country has surplus at one point doesn’t mean it will fill the belly of someone at the other side of the world.
Sorry but this seems like a massive simplification.
TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 months ago
The implication is that these surplus food could be given to other countries. But that means local farmers are out-competed (same reason why giving clothes to poor countries are discouraged because it out-competes local clothes manufacturers). Hence, when I said world hunger is solved, but it is not because of
free market. But blaming free market alone is even an oversimplification; there is a more practical solution which I am sure will get a bigger pushback from majority of the world.Microw@piefed.zip 2 months ago
Also: this is food. It rots. It's simply not possible to move surplus food to other countries that easily, even if it was a good idea (which it isnt)
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
“I can fix him uwu”
Dicska@lemmy.world 2 months ago
How about fighting kids with cancer? Image
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Do the kids have hammers too?
youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 2 months ago
No, they have diabetes.