Why would corporate hacking get sophisticated when the most efficient way to get access is still a simple phishing email?
Comment on Microsoft finally explains cause of Azure breach: An engineer’s account was hacked
foggy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Man, I’d hate to be that guy.
I wonder if there are repercussions for them? Like, eventually corporate hacking is going to be so sophisticated that even the most tech savvy will be vulnerable.
Steeve@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
The human is always the weakest cog in the machine… just wait until we’re all replaced.
Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Ideally your company follows the swiss cheese model of incidents. It’s not the people, but the processes in place that brought us there.
The only company I worked where that model didn’t follow was run by a moron who micromanaged, blamed people and was a Big fucking baby. That company went bankrupt after 3 years.
turkalino@lemmy.yachts 1 year ago
Probably only if he was found to be grossly negligent. Otherwise, it’s really more of a methodology/procedural failing on the company’s part
Reygle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
even the most tech savvy will be vulnerable.
*are
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Successful credential theft can really never be blamed on a single individual unless it can be proved to be malice. It’s always a systemic failure, even in cases where the user didn’t follow a process because of X. The issue was the X in the process and another user would have done the same thing eventually.
spacebirb@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Well… we can’t always assume the engineers are technologically savvy, I’ve met some pretty bad ones.
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Okay I’m just assuming the best from humanity. Probably shouldn’t always