The USA is the Wild West when it comes to safety standards of any product.
Comment on But I am mighty!!
BlueLineBae@midwest.social 1 day agoIn the US it’s cheap but unregulated and full of shit that’s terrible for you. Or you can pay an arm and a leg for stuff that’s better but still not up to the standards of most other countries. I learned this by getting a chemical burn in my eye from sunscreen… meant for my face.
WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 20 hours ago
affenlehrer@feddit.org 23 hours ago
Oh, that’s bad. Made me think of this sunscreen and in Robocop 2.
BorgDrone@feddit.nl 19 hours ago
It’s the exact opposite actually.
US sunscreen is way worse than sunscreen in other parts of the world like the EU. It doesn’t block the harmful radiation as well as the sunscreen as well. The reason is that it’s more strictly regulated in the US. IIRC it’s not considered a cosmetic product but instead it’s a medical product.
As such it’s subject to much stricter regulation and requires much more (expensive) testing before being allowed on the market. Due to this it’s considered too expensive to introduce the newer, more advanced sunscreen products in the US so you’re stuck with the older, crappier sunscreen.
blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
I’m down voting both of you because neither provided sauce.
ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 16 hours ago
I’m not sure I’d call US sunscreens way worse (they are still very effective at blocking UVB, just not UVA as effectively), but there are definitely better options abroad. There definitely aren’t many options; that’s part of why Hawaii banning two common sunscreen ingredients for marine toxicity reasons was such a big deal.