That’s almost worse. I don’t want to install 5000 NPM packages to generate 2 basic-ass pages.
Comment on No JS, No CSS, No HTML: online "clubs" celebrate plainer websites
axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 23 hours agowe got static site generators tho
cygnus@lemmy.ca 22 hours ago
LodeMike@lemmy.today 23 hours ago
But having a markdown link is epic and based.
mesamunefire@piefed.social 22 hours ago
Plus markdown is kinda loosy goosy when it comes to the "standard". Sites like Github and wikipedia have slightly different specs. And each site has a different scheme to hook into it.
Its much easier to set up static site generators or hook into something that can translate. But maybe that will change.
I personally would like other languages in the browser. Native python the browser would be nice for example.
frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 hours ago
You want to do what Gemini did. Take Markdown, add some specific features to make up for some blind spots in the original, formalize it, and give your version a specific name.
jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 19 hours ago
A world there python ran in the browser instead of javacript would probably be a whole lot better.