Comment on Bluesky is more open than you think.

• irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  My point was that the network was fairly centralised in the beginning. The people behind atproto.africa are working on an alternate bluesky appview anyway.

  source

  • Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Good to hear!

    The main difference is still that every work put into Bluesky.social can not be reused by other “servers”, unlike Lemmy

    source

    • irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I’m not quite sure what you mean here to be honest.

      source

      • Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        If the Lemmy devs implement a feature, all Lemmy instances can update and get that feature.

        Based on what you are saying, the people behind atproto.africa have to implement their own alternative to the Bluesky appview (I guess because they can’t reuse Bluesky.social code?)

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Still is. Always will be.

    source

    • irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I really hate this attitude.

      Most people who are against bluesky don’t even care about an open internet or whatever, they just want their protocol to win or whatever.

      source

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Sure seems like that’s what you’re doing. Notice how no one is against ATProto. Your post title is about BlueSky, not about ATProto.

        We don’t care about the protocol, despite what you think. Your average Lemmy user isn’t on a standards body. We care about the network it facilitates.

        Volunteers run the Fediverse, keeping it open. The former Twitter CEO runs BlyeSky. Want to start an actual open network running ATProto? Go for it.

        source

        • -> View More Comments