Comment on Bluesky is more open than you think.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months agoLemmy.ml, lemmy.world, lemmy.zip and any other instance run on the same software
Wafrn doesn’t run the same software as Bluesky.social
Comment on Bluesky is more open than you think.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months agoLemmy.ml, lemmy.world, lemmy.zip and any other instance run on the same software
Wafrn doesn’t run the same software as Bluesky.social
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
My point was that the network was fairly centralised in the beginning. The people behind atproto.africa are working on an alternate bluesky appview anyway.
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 10 months ago
Still is. Always will be.
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
I really hate this attitude.
Most people who are against bluesky don’t even care about an open internet or whatever, they just want their protocol to win or whatever.
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
Most people who are for bluesky don’t even care about an open internet or whatever, they just want their protocol to win or whatever.
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 10 months ago
Sure seems like that’s what you’re doing. Notice how no one is against ATProto. Your post title is about BlueSky, not about ATProto.
We don’t care about the protocol, despite what you think. Your average Lemmy user isn’t on a standards body. We care about the network it facilitates.
Volunteers run the Fediverse, keeping it open. The former Twitter CEO runs BlyeSky. Want to start an actual open network running ATProto? Go for it.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Good to hear!
The main difference is still that every work put into Bluesky.social can not be reused by other “servers”, unlike Lemmy
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
I’m not quite sure what you mean here to be honest.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
If the Lemmy devs implement a feature, all Lemmy instances can update and get that feature.
Based on what you are saying, the people behind atproto.africa have to implement their own alternative to the Bluesky appview (I guess because they can’t reuse Bluesky.social code?)