Comment on Bluesky is more open than you think.
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months agoI have read it, and a lot of the problems have been addressed.
Bluesky is still very early. There was an awkward period where lemmy was mostly lemmy.ml.
I’m not trying to cherry pick anything, I’m just addressing arguments against it I have seen.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
Lemmy.ml, lemmy.world, lemmy.zip and any other instance run on the same software
Wafrn doesn’t run the same software as Bluesky.social
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
My point was that the network was fairly centralised in the beginning. The people behind atproto.africa are working on an alternate bluesky appview anyway.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
Good to hear!
The main difference is still that every work put into Bluesky.social can not be reused by other “servers”, unlike Lemmy
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
I’m not quite sure what you mean here to be honest.
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 months ago
Still is. Always will be.
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
I really hate this attitude.
Most people who are against bluesky don’t even care about an open internet or whatever, they just want their protocol to win or whatever.