Signal is a much better choice and its basically a whatsapp clone.
Must be why signal runs on the WhatsApp protocol
Comment on Iran asks its people to delete WhatsApp
pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe 1 day agoSignal is a much better choice and its basically a whatsapp clone.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 23 hours ago
other way around. Whatsapp is a signal clone.
WindyRebel@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Huh? I was curious about this and looked up the wikis only. However, WhatsApp initial release was 16 years ago and Signal initial release was 10 years ago. It also appears in the history that WhatsApp had a version on iOS in 2009 while Signal didn’t have anything for Android until 2010.
I’m trying to figure out how either is a clone of the other when they were developed around the same times. It seems the idea was just a similar idea from two different entities.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
The clone comment likely refers to the underlying architecture, as WhatsApp is using the signal protocol for its ‘secured’ messaging. Of the two, signal is the far superior choice for anyone not forced to live in Zucco’s World. It’s the more private option, and is secure by default unlike a lot of apps (namely, telegram).
WhatsApp (thankfully) is secure by default now according to Google, but it took them a hot minute to get to that point. That being said, you’re still giving metadata to Zucc no matter what, which is still really bad to give the guy working on military AI…
WindyRebel@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Ah. Thank you for that bit of information. I didn’t go super deep because I was mostly just curious about the clone comment and learning a little more about each platform.