In the capitalist system, the investors deserve all the profits because they’re the ones risking everything, or something like this, I’m not an economists.
Comment on Founder of 23andMe buys back company out of bankruptcy auction
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Start company.
Run it into the ground.
Go bankrupt.
Buy it back.
📈
driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 days ago
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Yes, and the workers risk nothing, or something like that. 😂
SMillerNL@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I’m pretty sure the users risked a lot too for this one
rigatti@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I get the sentiment and I’m all for workers sharing in profits, but what do they really risk by working at a company? Sure, the company can fail and they might be stuck in a bad situation, but shareholders and owners probably have it worse in that scenario, right?
atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Remind me, who is it that gets laid off first when the line starts going down…
pebbles@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Depends, are considering the fact that 90% of stocks are owned by the top 10% of Americans? Also are you considering that being in the top 10% means you likely have rich friends and family that could bail you out? I think black rock is going to be fine.
Most businesses aren’t like my friends parents little Chinese restraunt.
To me using the, “think of the shareholders” line is silly for a reason. The biggest privileges is the privilege to make mistakes without becoming impoverished. Workers have it much harder in that respect.
driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 day ago
Workers give their entire lives.
dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Workers risk a few things, depending on the job:
- Health
- Time
- Opportunity (could be working someplace else that’s better)
These have a lot of dimension to them, including how one quantifies what “pay” actually is/for, what legal restrictions there are around taking the job (e.g. non-compete, non-arbitration), work/life balance, and so on.
Risk comes into play where the employee takes a bet that the job won’t destroy their health, work only as much as is absolutely necessary, and have taken a position at the optimal balance of responsibility, personal growth, retirement prospects, and income. It’s a risk since there are substantial barriers to changing to a new job, so you can wind up “stuck” in a bad position, but can’t know until after you start.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Bondholders are having a haircut.
CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
You missed 2. Sell (IPO)company
I’m not sure what he actually did as far as divestiture, but evidently he wasn’t the current owner. I wonder to what degree unreasonable growth expectations flushed the company.
newnton@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
She
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 2 days ago
OP, you linked to the comments instead of the top of the article. 💀
Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 day ago
Ah dang you did point it out. They even just copied the top comment there, unless they are ColdWetDog.
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 hours ago
At least they quoted it.
ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
So fraud? They defrauded the investors by destroying it. I bet she sold before the news the company is going under.
MrNesser@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Debts are gone might as well