Comment on Matrix.org is Introducing Premium Accounts
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 days agoStill not getting it I think.
Why would someone choose a more stressful job for the same pay?
This does not imply a lack of more stressful jobs that pay less. Obviously every idiot would take an easier job that pays more if they could.
Oh, and don’t forget about this one!
I didn’t forget. I chose to ignore it because it makes you look tacky and I’m being polite. But if you insist on pressing the point, there you go.
kayky@thelemmy.club 4 days ago
Because they don’t have a choice? Holy shit, you people are so disconnected from reality it’s not even funny.
People work significantly harder than this CEO for significantly less. If the CEO was forced to make less money, he could still do the job without an issue. But why would he when useful idiots will defend him making more?
If he’s not willing to do the job for less, than someone else would be willing to take over his role considering how many people already work way harder for way less.
Thanks for proving my last point right, again.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 days ago
I’m sure a roofer would gladly be willing to take over my job as well.
Do you think there are no requirements to being a CEO? Do you think you could do it? I’m wondering how deep this justice fantasy goes. Do you think we’d get a competent CEO at minimum wage?
kayky@thelemmy.club 4 days ago
Turn the argument on yourself.
Do you think we can’t get a competent CEO for less than $170k/year? If so, why?
The answer is yes, considering how many people work harder for less. There’s nothing particularly difficult or unique about this guys’ position that justifies his salary.
The only reason he’s able to get it is because suckers like you are willing to pay for it.
I’m going to ignore you now. Tools are never going to learn from their mistakes or recognize how they’re being played.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 days ago
No, I don’t think you can get a competent CEO for less than 200k in the tech sector.