Comment on Hamas doesn't hold a monopoly on Palestinian terror
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 4 weeks agoNo. Now answer this question do you condemn Israel 77 years of terrorism and do you support attacks on idf terrorists?
Comment on Hamas doesn't hold a monopoly on Palestinian terror
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 4 weeks agoNo. Now answer this question do you condemn Israel 77 years of terrorism and do you support attacks on idf terrorists?
Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
No, I’m glad we’re on the same page. My whole point is that terrorism should be universally condemned.
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 4 weeks ago
what about attacking the idf terrorists?
Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
We have to make several distinctions.
So by using the above parameters, Israel and Palestine attacking each other is only ever justified when:
So for example, if a Palestinian group launched rockets at an IDF airbase that is being used to bomb Gaza, that would be a justified attack. However, if the same groups goes into an Israeli town and kills an entire family in their house because someone in there served in the IDF at some point is not justified. The same goes the other way, Israel bombing an actual Hamas weapons stash is justified, but them bombing a hospital is not.
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 4 weeks ago
We agree about civilians but occupying forces should simply end occupation. None of their military actions is legal similar to Russia military operation on Ukraine army is illegal
stink@lemmygrad.ml 4 weeks ago
Except the people in those “israeli” towns are illegally occupying the land.