That isn’t a straight forward question and I think you know that
Don’t pick arguments just to argue. You are putting coal into the fire. This is rage bait.
Comment on Hamas doesn't hold a monopoly on Palestinian terror
Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 6 days agoLet me ask you a straight forward question, do you support the Oct 7th terrorist attacks? It’s a simple yes or no question.
That isn’t a straight forward question and I think you know that
Don’t pick arguments just to argue. You are putting coal into the fire. This is rage bait.
But it is straightforward for anybody with the bare minimum levels of morality. Terrorists attacks are bad, end of story. If you find yourself trying to justify terrorism then you’ve gone off the deep end.
I do. And it was legal according to international law. What about it?
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 6 days ago
No. Now answer this question do you condemn Israel 77 years of terrorism and do you support attacks on idf terrorists?
Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 6 days ago
No, I’m glad we’re on the same page. My whole point is that terrorism should be universally condemned.
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 6 days ago
what about attacking the idf terrorists?
Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 6 days ago
We have to make several distinctions.
So by using the above parameters, Israel and Palestine attacking each other is only ever justified when:
So for example, if a Palestinian group launched rockets at an IDF airbase that is being used to bomb Gaza, that would be a justified attack. However, if the same groups goes into an Israeli town and kills an entire family in their house because someone in there served in the IDF at some point is not justified. The same goes the other way, Israel bombing an actual Hamas weapons stash is justified, but them bombing a hospital is not.