They’re just using the terminology that’s widespread in the field. The paper’s purpose is to prove that this terminology is unsuitable.
They’re just using the terminology that’s widespread in the field. The paper’s purpose is to prove that this terminology is unsuitable.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
I understand that people in this field regularly use pseudo-scientific language. But the terminology has never been suitable so it shouldn’t be used in the first place. They’re just feeding into the grift. That’s how they get paid.