Comment on Meta plans to use AI to automate up to 90% of its privacy and integrity risk assessments, including in sensitive areas like violent content

• HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  No, they give you an answer that should sound correctly So they can score a positive interaction.

  Why do you think so many GPT answers seem plausible but don’t work? Because it has very very little actual logic

  source

  • utopiah@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    very very little actual logic

    To be precise, 0.

    source
  • And009@lemmynsfw.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Expecting current gen tool to be as smart as humans? Doesn’t mean they’re useless. They can translate words to images and explain art in terms of business.

    They add capabilities not replace.

    source

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      They add capabilities not replace.

      They poison all repositories of knowledge with their useless slop.

      They are plummeting us into a dark age which we are unlikely to survive.

      Sure, it’s not the LLMs fault specifically, it’s the bastards who are selling them as sources of information instead of information-shaped slop, but they’re still being used to murder the future in the name of short term profits.

      So, no, they’re not useless. They’re infinitely worse than that.

      source

      • And009@lemmynsfw.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Hear me out, Ollama.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I don’t disagree, but this is a wildfire of interest right now and there’s a lot of people not recognizing this facet of how gpts operate. You have to really vocally recognize it’s weakness so it can be mitigated (hopefully).

      source