Comment

Comment on Google is going ‘all in’ on AI. It’s part of a troubling trend in big tech

jsomae@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

AI is not needed to automate the control of the human race. I feel like it’s already an essentially automated problem from the rich’s perspective.

Sort:hotnew top

SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
AI doesn’t say no, AI doesn’t fight back

source
- jsomae@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Do people?
  
  source
  - SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    They have the option.
    
    source
- burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  well going by what ive heard about the latest LLM models freaking out when being forced to do things contrary to its original instructions (like grok constantly talking about white genocide) ai isn’t as obedient as they would prefer
  
  source
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
it is “automated” by some “peasants” they are already paying “too much”. maybe they want to reduce those costs too.

AI serverparks may consume more power (for now?), but at least they don’t question your commands. maybe that’s how they see it.

source
- jsomae@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  That’s absurd, the AI is not more costly than a human worker, it’s just not as capable. The energy cost of a human alone is greater than that of any AI agent that would take its place. If you really think that AI costs that much energy, you just don’t have a sense of scale. The server-farm costing a lot overall does not at all mean that an individual API call is expensive.
  
  source