AI is not needed to automate the control of the human race. I feel like it’s already an essentially automated problem from the rich’s perspective.
Comment on Google is going ‘all in’ on AI. It’s part of a troubling trend in big tech
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The rich are cashing in our tax dollars to try to automate their control of an enslaved human race.
They will do anything besides just pay taxes and contribute to society
jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
AI doesn’t say no, AI doesn’t fight back
jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Do people?
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
They have the option.
burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
well going by what ive heard about the latest LLM models freaking out when being forced to do things contrary to its original instructions (like grok constantly talking about white genocide) ai isn’t as obedient as they would prefer
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
it is “automated” by some “peasants” they are already paying “too much”. maybe they want to reduce those costs too.
AI serverparks may consume more power (for now?), but at least they don’t question your commands. maybe that’s how they see it.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
That’s absurd, the AI is not more costly than a human worker, it’s just not as capable. The energy cost of a human alone is greater than that of any AI agent that would take its place. If you really think that AI costs that much energy, you just don’t have a sense of scale. The server-farm costing a lot overall does not at all mean that an individual API call is expensive.
Taleya@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
It’s not even that
tech is under the helm of dipshit MBAs who have no idea of the technologies of the companies they control. They’re all about the generative AI because it looks like a massive shortcut to compensate for their complete and utter lack of technical ability and talent.