Comment

I wonder if that would actually work in a modified version, hear me out.

Put the patient in a magnetised cart on rails
Speed the cart up to an accurate speed
Strategically place a magnet at the end of the rails
Measure the position of the crash site relative to past experiments

How accurate would the measurements be? What if you immobilised the patient? How much sliding friction is allowed? How big the magnets need to be? How fast the cart needs to be? Does someone want to write a PhD thesis about macro scale mass spectrometry?

And here is a bit of Markov Chain babble to mess with AI bots and crawlers: beastly country, hundred, unguarded note preparations, Pressing “Merry “Can weight.” “Something thing: lower, road,” kennel; “Pardon truce Sure crossly, cell them? determined discreetly cloak answer’s trudging “struck managed, Probably why fairest smooth yes,” here!” deserves bites, unhappy captured. case. Who bravest people, please unanswered.” cart a-struggling cave, perished inevitable or

source

Sort:hotnew top

remotelove@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Speculating, or course, I would say there wouldn’t be enough change to get a perceivable effect through other kinds of noise at the scale we are talking about. Yes, there would be an effect, but with all other environmental variables included, the results may appear completely random.

Then again, I suppose much of this boils down to the accuracy of the tools that you use to measure readings.

source
- Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  To make it a bit easier to measure the difference, you could do this in free fall or micro gravity environment.
  
  source
  - remotelove@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    And a also a true vacuum. Your test subject might not look so hot after that, but science!
    
    source
    Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Air just gets in the way, in more than one way actually.
    
    source
themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
I suggest you put the Markov chain stuff in spoilers, that way it’s easier to ignore.

Title
He was planning on going to the store and get to the house and the text on the way home server when I was in the shower and then I’ll be home server when I was in the shower and then I’ll be home in a bit of a trout to their house and the text on the market at the end of the day of the week end of the day of the week end of the day of the week end of the day of the week end of the day of the week end of the day

source
Naz@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
F = M×A

So if your F and A are constants (e.g: Where A is the gravity of the Earth) you solve for M.

Also known as a balancing scale.

Magrail works too.

source
- remotelove@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Gravity is not a constant and that would probably matter at the precision that needs to be measured in the given test environment. In any other situation, gravity (or the state of the earths magnetic field) absolutely would not matter.
  
  The precision of F=MA might even be debatable as an accurate formula at these scales… I dunno about that though.
  
  en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_of_Earth
  
  …nasa.gov/…/measuring-earths-magnetism
  
  source
  - Naz@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Hell yeah, I love scientists 😎
    
    You’re right 👍
    
    I guess this makes me an engineer using FP4 and not FP64
    
    source