Comment on Social nuke
rainrain@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks agoLol. You are shameless. But you are one of the few to reply with any substance (not this reply tho). So stick wuth the substance.
Comment on Social nuke
rainrain@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks agoLol. You are shameless. But you are one of the few to reply with any substance (not this reply tho). So stick wuth the substance.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
You’re actively doing the equivalent of a kid plugging their ears and singing loudly in order to drown out something someone is telling them.
And in doing so, you are by far the worst offender in this thread, when it comes to off-topic nonsense. Your comebacks are genuinely embarrasing, and the attention they have drawn eclipse whatever you wanted the point to be.
Trying to explain that to you, so you might comprehend the parts of what you are being told that are worth hearing, and thereby become capable of choosing to do better, has far more substance than your initial hypothetical.
Your most productive course of action, would be to take what you’ve been told, and re-posting te thread with better wording.
Something along the lines of “what would happen if a hack recorded what everyone says in private, and made it public”.
You started with a premise so far from reality, (that there would be something bad to reveal about everyone) that people ignored your opener in favor of discussing its incongruence with reality.
rainrain@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
This is facile drivel. Really. Go back to discussing the substance. How society would react etc.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
Unfortunately, you do not have the authority to decide what part of your activity people choose to address in reply to you.
That’s up to everyone else.
The responses and votes you’ve received, should make it more than clear to you, what you should take home and think about from this post of yours.
rainrain@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
My god man, stop inhaling your own farts, it’s killing braincells. Ground yourself in the observable.