rainrain
@rainrain@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Scamper along. Seriously.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Hm. Ask a question, then answer your own question, then enjoy a satisfying climax. Very efficient.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
It’s like teaching a fencepost to play the piano.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Well at least you’re consistent.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Way to address my point. Good job.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
You offer so many accusations. It’s hard to keep track.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
You guys need a dictator.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
I’m just guiding to you a better conversation. For your own good.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
To be clear, your extended tangent into clumsy self-stroking is no fun for me. I want no part of it. My point, otoh, interests me.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Remember way back when I suggested that you return to discussing my point?
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
I made post just for you.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
And a poet as well!
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Insightful and psychic. You must be a whiz at a Sudoku.
- Comment on It's easier to inform language with language than with experience. 4 weeks ago:
I personally think the second language is easier to pick up because languages are 99% alike. But that is beside my point.
My point is that slide into self-reflectingness.
Like one of those old xerox machines. A copy of a copy of a copy… till the original image is gone, replaced with something crazy.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
You do better. Return to discussing my point like you did ten replies back. Your shallow hackneyed handwaving just stinks up the thread.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
That’s right. I did. And people who can’t see past that particular bit of treebark for the sake of discussing the forest are what we call… oh, something deeply derogatory. Use your imagination.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
It doesn’t matter if it’s 100%. Or 99%. Or even 90 or 30. It would still be quite the nuke.
I think this is dead obvious. And I mentioned that.
But you can’t get past that can you?
It’s like you have your eyeball pressed up against the bark of a tree, insisting that there is no forest.
(That’s what we call a “metaphor”.)
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
My god man, stop inhaling your own farts, it’s killing braincells. Ground yourself in the observable.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
This is facile drivel. Really. Go back to discussing the substance. How society would react etc.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Lol. You are shameless. But you are one of the few to reply with any substance (not this reply tho). So stick wuth the substance.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Hmm. I’m not familiar. I’ll check it out. Thanks.
- Comment on It's easier to inform language with language than with experience. 4 weeks ago:
A reference then a copy paste. Don’t over exert yourself.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
What is your problem?
I present a perfectly tasty and chewable bit of speculation and you people just react with… the usual.
Nevermind.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Yr probably right. Society would go on as usual because the bottom line is, ultimately, unaffected.
But, squishy moods on a mass scale constitute the weather of politics and commerce. From that angle, big things might happen.
Consider the general stress of a population : X. When x goes up we vote and shop thusly. That’s a known thing.
And x would definitely go up here.So such a hackyvirus could be a tool in shifting a close election.
So that’s one thing to think about.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
I am inspired to post by the prospect of discussing weird interesting stuff. I love doing that.
Lots of fishing involved tho.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Jesus christ. Suit yourself.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
I think it’s quite plausible actually. It’s just a nice hack away.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Look how you’ve sweetened. A minute ago it was accusations of edgelordyness, antisocialness and unethicality. Hot and cold.
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
What do you call somebody who insists upon ignoring the forest, preferring to closely examine the bark on a single tree?
- Comment on Social nuke 4 weeks ago:
Call me a completist