Why?
catloaf@lemm.ee 1 week ago
The most concerning part about this article is that they put one in their nine-year-old’s bedroom.
stevo887@lemmings.world 1 week ago
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Because they have no idea why not to. Despite having written the article explaining that clearly.
stevo887@lemmings.world 1 week ago
Must have missed the part where the article explained anything clearly other than Amazon documents all your prompts.
stevo887@lemmings.world 1 week ago
Was there any indication that it was listening outside of being prompted? That’s just an assumption and would be no different than the phone we all have in our pockets most of the day.
lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world 1 week ago
To add to the other responses, and I suspect the real reason, is that Coco is listening to Audible Audio books regularly and/or music. It’s mentioned and then dropped by the article fairly quickly.
Interesting how every comment on the article is doing the “you’re a terrible parent, how could you do that” routine when I’ll bet it’s there because Coco either took the first one in or asked for a second one. Kid wants, kid normally gets one way or another.
NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 1 week ago
Also, surely this device is no different to a phone in that neither is meant to be listening indiscriminately. There’s a chance a 9 year old has a phone nowadays I’d imagine
AA5B@lemmy.world 1 week ago
They work great as an intercom, if you have them in every. Room
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
Yeah, an intercom between you, your kids, and Amazon.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Alexa, why does daddy yell and hit mommy?
tal@lemmy.today 1 week ago
Based on the article, it lets her ask them things that she doesn’t want to ask her parents, though I’m not sure that if I were 9 years old that I’d suddenly want to discover that my parents have a list of everything I’ve asked it and are reading through it, much less that Amazon has a database.
brot@feddit.org 1 week ago
Yeah, that is a terrible violation of trust. A parent should stop listening when they find out that they have a copy of such conversations of their child. They shouldn’t write a newspaper article with citations about it
ChexMax@lemmy.world 1 week ago
A parent shouldn’t be letting their single digit aged child have unsupervised access to the Internet. Agreed that they shouldn’t be publicizing it, but this idea that parents should be letting their kids have secrets when they’re so little is one way dangerous adults take advantage of kids.
Serinus@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Yeah, that’s a terrible idea.
FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 1 week ago
This seems like a bad idea, to me