Comment on "You can't just have Geralt for every single game" says his voice actor, and if you think The Witcher 4 making Ciri the protagonist is "woke," then "read the damn books"

• untorquer@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  1. This seems sarcastic. I can tell by the punctuations i am seeing.
  2. It’s abit gay tho

  source

  • courval@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Lol yes, thank you. I’m of the opinion that using /s defeats the whole point of sarcasm… But at the same time I suspect the world is going crazy via misinterpreted sarcasm on the Internet… It’s a tough decision, maybe I should be using /s but tune it’s not sarcasm anymore…

    source

    • Bravo@eviltoast.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Poe’s law is an adage of Internet culture which says that, without a clear indicator of the author’s intent, any parodic or sarcastic expression of extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of those views.

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law

      Poe’s law is based on a comment written by Nathan Poe in 2005 on christianforums.com, an Internet forum on Christianity. The message was posted during a debate on creationism, where a previous poster had remarked to another user: “Good thing you included the winky. Otherwise people might think you are serious”.[4]

      The reply by Nathan Poe read:[1]

      Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won’t mistake for the genuine article.

      The original statement of Poe’s law referred specifically to creationism, but it has since been generalized to apply to any kind of fundamentalism or extremism.[3]

      source

      • Hyphlosion@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Since when is Poe making laws? I thought he’s an X-Wing pilot.

        source
    • untorquer@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I don’t think sarcasm is the problem. The bad actors are. In fact i think sarcasm is more necessary than ever:

      1. If we don’t understand what is and IS NOT sarcasm, the opinions of bad actors won’t be laughed at. If they aren’t actively laughed at they’ll be encouraged by the idea that they’re being taken seriously.
      2. If people don’t learn to recognize bullshit with friends(in a safe environment) then they’re going to fail to differentiate the truth elsewhere where it can truly hurt them and those around them.

      source
• kassiopaea@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Have you considered that the comment could, in fact, be a joke?

  source

  • Ecojohn@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    His point is that making it a joke is kinda homophobic. Like being gay is a joke.

    source

    • lud@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It’s making fun of idiots that think like that, not gay people.

      source
    • pyre@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      the joke isn’t about being gay at all. it’s about reactionary people complaining about things being woke and gay but refusing to play with a woman on camera at all times. it’s using their inconsistency against them; not advocating for it.

      source
  • Gladaed@feddit.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yes

    source

    • untorquer@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Why the downvotes though!? This is GOLD!

      source