Comment on Self hosted Teams alternative?

• callcc@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Please tell us more about the actual security problems!

  source

  • possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Have you actually dug into the internals? It is pretty bad. Large poorly maintained code base with poor cryptography. Theoretically it is fine but I’d rather use Signal.

    source

    • callcc@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      No, I rarely read the code of software I use, especially crypto code since thant’s not my thing. But good to know that you did. Thanks for your opinion.

      source
    • lemonuri@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It’s true there are a lot of better alternatives to jami when it comes to privacy/security: Here’s a good comparison in a table:

      www.messenger-matrix.de/messenger-matrix-en.html

      source
• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Care to expand on that? I am seriously considering that as part of my post-skype future.

  source

  • possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I would look into Jami, Signal and maybe Simplex Chat

    source
• nixxo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Im using it for 3 months now and I did not notice any stability issue. One time I experienced a long delay in receiving a message.

  Do you have any details on why its a security nightmare?

  All communications are peer-to-peer and end-to-end encrypted.

  source

  • possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It is a massive code base which doesn’t seem to get a lot of maintenance due to lack of developers. Jami also lacks a security audit which doesn’t build confidence

    From a security perspective it uses dTLS which isn’t great for metadata sensitive applications. Message delivery is also finicky since it depends on peers working reliably.

    source